Replies: 1 Comment
This is the worst idea in the world.
1) The internet allows users/readers to scan the news and read it at their own pace (non-linear.)
TV news is totally linear. You must watch the news at the pace and timing in which it is delivered TO you. This totally defeats the whole purpose of the Internet. I just tried the Delaware paper's webcast. It was awful. I watched 3 minutes of TV (with two commercials I was FORCED to sit though) and got less information than if I spent 45 seconds reading three stories on their site. So, why are users going to care about this?
2) Video production is NOT easy!!! The resources it takes to develop a package for TV require editing, writing, a voiceover and an intro. Newspaper people think it's all just the magic of "video." IDIOTS!
3) Newspapers need to focus on putting up *compelling* video clips to accompany stories that help tell MORE of the story. NOT telling the "whole" story in video like a TV station. I put "whole" in quotes because any numbskull knows that there is very little real information delivered in a 45 second story on TV -- just look at a script and compare it to a 10 inch newspaper story. Worlds apart in terms of real info.
Good luck newspapers -- you are doomed if this is your path.
Posted by Jim Wilson @ 12/23/2004 08:18 AM CST
"The future is not something we enter. The future is something we create."Leonard Sweet